Systems and Society Blog Post: Week 2


Blog Post Assignment

Part 1: Write a 100/150-word 'positionality' statement. 

 Task 1. To write you positionality statement, you can use the “Wheel of Power & Privilege” (below) to scaffold your thoughts and reflections. See also, Catherine D’Ignazio’s positionality statement (below) as example. However, it is entirely up to you what you include or exclude from this statement to describe who you are.

Example:



My Positionality

Annie Lambert is a post graduate HCI student at Newcastle University. Before moving to Newcastle, she worked 3 years in South Korea and 2 years in Las Vegas upon completing her Undergraduate from BYU. From a white middle class background, she primarily grew up in Phoenix Arizona but moved to Redmond Washington where she was exposed to more cultures and diverse perspectives. Upon expanding her connections with people she become more self aware of her privilege. 


She also had the opportunity and privilege of traveling to many countries in her youth. 


Task 2. Consider the following questions. 

  • Were there aspects of yourself that you were comfortable or uncomfortable to write about? Were there aspect that you thought were not appropriate to share professionally? Why? 

  • How your social locations & identities impact what you know about the world and experiences?  

  • How does this impact you approach design and research problems, including choices around what problems to solve, and how these might be solved? 


Make some notes for yourself. These will become useful as you progress with your report.


Part 2: Consider values  driving your design project or area of interest. 

Remember that Reflection and Reflexivity in RRI is about the values of designers, scientists but also institutions, organizations and funders. This includes developing understanding and awareness of (i) the ways value-systems of designers/organizations might be in conflict with those of social groups/societies; and (ii) the ways designers can make assumptions about what might be good for users. 

Task 1. The values driving your design project.

  • List: What are the value-system driving your design project? Or chosen area of interest? For this, you might consider the values we explore earlier this week in the group activity on Tuesday. Values might include - user's control over their data, transparency, privacy, inclusion, etc.
  • Prioritize: Are there some values that are more important for you than others? Why?  
  • Is your design project or area of interest reflecting well the values that matter to you? Why? Why not? 

Write 200-words articulating your reflections. 

3) Share any reflections or question that doing this activity sparked for you as a comment in the discussion below. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slow Computing, Digital Civics and Portfolio Project

 Slow Computing & Digital Civics Slow Computing: - Cultural shift towards slowing down life's pace - Computing is deeply imbedded in our lives - Slow computing VS Calm technology     - calm tech promotes moments of reflection and mental rest. The info is presented passively and it's usually in our poriferas.  - Some Design: meditative bodily introspection -Fast Technology: well-defined task, efficient, easy to use Reflection: Most companies are focus on quick profits, fast technology. Slow technology cares more about the users mental wellbeing. As UX designers we need to design for slowness, solitude and mental rest. How do we change the functionalities and design to help the users not get overwhelmed? We could avoid numbers based goals and information. We should reward users for taking their time and  "Living Technology Lives", people are always on their phones and rely on it heavily. It has become an assumption that everyone has a smartphone and is online 24/7.
Read more

* Research: Different Analysis

Image
  Research Methods - Be transparent about what your biases are/could be in your research. - Theme names give some indication of what problem you are addressing -Appendices will give people opportunity to check your code and data Thematic Analysis: Look for patterns (Themes, hence the name) across textual data. The examples he showed was transcripts from conversations between researchers. He also showed us an example where the designers that updated the Metro used Mural to organize their themes and notes on the different areas that need to be addressed in their design. The themes can have subcategories that are more descriptive( CCTV--> Anti-social behavior). The Process:  Familiarization--> coding --> generate themes --> review themes codes --> define and name themes --> write up analysis  Grounded Theory: This one is different because you don't have a specific theory or hypothesis (or preconceptions about the theory). You just select an area of interest and begin
Read more

Week 2: Lecture 4 Ideation, Co-creation and concept sketching

 Ideation and Concept Sketching Project expectations: Communicate a critically analyzed design  Don Normans 4 Principles: 1. Understand people 2. Focus on the people 3. Solving the right problem not the symptoms     -Users may tell you small problems(Symptoms) and it's your jobs to identify the bigger problem 4. Always be iterating and improving Card-based Techniques for Ideation: When designers are developing ideas it forces yourself to consider different design/user aspects  Why? help us better understand the end user population and the research context or setting  What? Think about ideas and sensitize people to the ethics. Evokes consideration and discussion of longer term effects
Read more